How to fund and plan GP care vs QAS/Hospital?
A standard or extended GP visit (MBS item 23 or 36) is funded at a fraction of the cost of an ED, OPD or QAS attendance. There is no margin for consumables, PoC pathology, PoC imaging, and so on.
Additionally, GPs (especially the 'good' ones) are booked up in the same way that consultants in hospital OPD are booked up (but usually by days; not weeks or months in advance).
So, the community may benefit from a network of GP clinics funded like ED or OPD: fixed hourly rates, provided PoC pathology (eg iSTAT), PoC imaging (eg US), consumables (eg IV access, fluids, dressings, medications). Need not be 'whole' clinics eg one GP + one RN + one EN per session and the 'rest' of the clinic can carry on normal business like the rest of the hospital does regardless of ED activity.
Why the contribution is important
You're telling us that patients are preferring to attend ED for services that could be provided in the community, and you're right. The reasons people go to ED eather than the GP ought to be explored. You are likely to find that they are seeking prompt one-stop-shop access to diagnosis and management and the reason they get that at ED is because the facilities are set up (with stafs, infrastructure and funding) to provide what patients seek.
If you want those needs to be met in other settings which currently have the skills but not other resources, you need to invest appropriately.
by mcrice on August 12, 2019 at 03:32PM